I love watching the Tour de France (that’s cycling for the ones
who have no idea what I’m talking about). The home country’s public television
always live broadcasts all the entire stages of the Tour, so for me the
ultimate feeling of being too bored during the summer holiday is to watch an
entire stage of the Tour de France. And the Tour de France helped me survive
the week between BlueEyes’ due date and his actual birthday, when my belly was
too big and it was too hot outside to do anything else than bounce on a yoga
ball and watch entire days of Tour de France. So why write about the Tour de
France in October? Because the UCI just decided to take away all of Lance Armstrong’s seven Tour titles
after the US anti-doping agency released a huge amount of evidence against him.
This enormous amount of doping use suggests that Lance Armstrong was not the
only one, but that some/most/all (?) of the professional cyclists in the Tour
used some form of doping. This has caused some of the big sponsors, like
Rabobank,to quit sponsoring cycling teams. But it also means that somewhere in the world
there are teams of doctors that are able to mix drugs, vitamins and blood transfusions
in such a way that a man who was once a cancer patient, can a few years later
make it seem like he is the only one cycling while all of the others are
standing still (like in the prologue in 2005 when Lance Armstrong flew by Jan
Ullrich). Any other medical success of that size would for sure be discussed on
TV, but these people have to stay anonymous because what they do is not legal.
So does knowing that some, most or all of the cyclists use
doping make it less fun to watch? To me it doesn’t. It’s not like with doping
it’s easy to cycle 3500 kilometers in a couple weeks. It’s not like any person
could do it with the right amount of doping and it’s not like the athletes are
not sacrificing their life in order to train enough to be able to cycle in the
Tour de France.
So why not make it legal to use doping? Then the sport would
be kind of like Formula 1 or Nascar racing, where teams of people try to make
the best and fastest car. In this case teams of doctors and scientist would
build the best body to cycle with. We could study how that works, and test all
sorts of things, like viral vector mediated expression of genes to enhance muscle
fiber and oxygen transport. And the people behind this don’t have to hide
anymore but can share their knowledge with the world. I even thought of a name
for this discipline: cyclingpharmacology. Has a nice ring to it right?
Haha, I've thought the same thing! If they're gong to find ways to dope anyway, why don't they let them dope as much as they want? It might have interesting side effects... sudden death?
ReplyDeleteWell I'm not sure that being a professional athlete at that level is in any way healthy for you... probably not. And maybe making doping legal makes it safer instead of unsafer for athletes?
Delete