I didn’t just go to the home
country to eat all of the food that we missed
or to have BlueEyes be hugged by his grandparents, but also to talk about
opportunities to go back to the home country in a couple years and work there
to build my own research group. As I already explained, things are a bit different than in the US and the way to get to being an
independent researcher means first finding a job as a senior postdoc and from
there write grants to hire people. So I went to talk to two different labs,
both with people that I already knew and had worked with before. The first
thing that struck me was that in order to get a position I HAVE to bring my own
money (well, lab B is willing to hire me even without grant, but only if there
is enough money available, so no guarantees). Both labs have their positive and
negative sides and I have to decide in the coming weeks who I want to write
those grants with in order to move back home in about two years.
Lab A is within a big department where
people work together a lot. There’s a big name in the field of my newly
acquired expertise and together they publish in high impact journals, but on a
pretty wide variety of subjects. They have the fanciest equipment and a good infrastructure
for the multidisciplinary stuff that I’m interested in. However, the university
is cutting a lot of money and everybody NEEDS to bring in grant money in order
to keep the labs running. During our conversation, the PI had already figured
out what I needed to write my grant about even before I had told what my
interests were and what I wanted to work on in the future. After I left I felt
that we had only talked about money and not about the exciting science that we
were going to do. I really felt kind of depressed about the whole situation. Also, I only got a cup of tea. No lunch, no beers, and no ‘we would love to
have you work for us’. I know they would like me to come, because my current PI
saw Lab A’s PI at a meeting recently, but it didn’t really show. And then there
are some more personal issues that I know will annoy me at Lab A. They have a
lot do to with this.
Lab B is a lab with a very steady
(but not necessarily high impact) output in a specific field. I talked to Lab B’s
PI and another PI at the same institution about collaborating on the multidisciplinary
stuff that I want to do at a previous meeting, and I talked to both of them
this time too. The equipment there is okay, but less impressive than at Lab A.
I would be the first person to do this multidisciplinary stuff here, but there
is enough support on both ends of the disciplines to make it work I think. But
more importantly: we talked a lot about how my research would fit in with their
research and what kind of things I could propose in the grants. Also, I got
lunch and both PIs told me how much they wanted me to come to their lab. End
result: I was a lot happier at the end of that day.
So it seems I have made up my
mind already: I feel a lot more enthusiastic about Lab B, even though Lab A is
the stronger lab on paper. What do you think: Lab A or B?